Americans just cannot get enough of football on television.
According to a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Although ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, an incredible number of viewers keep watching, even though oahu is the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a game that drew just 20,256 fans a week ago but attracted an average television audience of 1,114,000, according to ESPN.”
Schrotenboer goes on to state, “Only one bowl game this past year drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers on average, according to Nielsen. That’s better compared to the 1.1 million who watched an opening day baseball game this past year between the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”
Could you imagine then a following scenario for the college football bowl season:
ESPN builds its own television studio strictly for the purpose of hosting college bowl games. The tv screen network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In this way, it doesn’t have middleman to cope with for these additional events, eliminating needing to negotiate with a different facility to host the game. No costs for having to operate a vehicle production trailers or fly technical crews halfway across the country.
Because this facility could be built as a tv studio and not being an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN might make attending the bowl game a genuine multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee along with the tv viewer to be unlike any other.
But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio could have just a limited quantity of seats, say 5,000 or less, which will minimize construction costs. The studio wouldn’t must be much larger than the typical college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough showing to the million plus viewers there are actually some fans in the stands ดูบอลสด.Thus, there wouldn’t be described as a single bad seat in the house. You’d be sure an up-close and personal bowl experience. And due to the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate through the entire facility.
Due to the limited way to obtain seats, this could force ticket demand (and prices) up. No further 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities that are less than the usual quarter full. It would be a 180-degree differ from the present experience, where many schools need certainly to rely on daily deal sites to help unload their share of allocated tickets.
Thus, the universities would benefit because they wouldn’t be required to buy the 1000s of tickets which they cannot sell (even on Groupon).
ESPN could use this facility multiple times during the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.
For example, in 2010 five additional college football teams qualified for a pan that they certainly were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network are not generating an incredible number of dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they’d much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers would prefer to be buying time on a tv program that most viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.
Schrotenboer states, “Schools, coaches and players also are interested – going to a pan game means more possible donations, more television exposure, more practice time and more bonus money.”